Portable satellite base stations bolster disaster response
August 01, 2012 | Ebrahim Busheri, Tim Phipps | 222903078
Terrestrial communication systems typically are knocked out by disasters, or overloaded following them. Here we review how satellite systems have overcome these problems for events such as 9/11 and last year’s Haitian earthquake, and how recent advances in portable base station design will give significantly greater access to communication networks in an emergency.
Page 1 of 4
Image 1: Destruction in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, following the 2010 earthquake.
Recent years have seen several significant national disasters around the globe, including the Thoku earthquake and tsunami, which led to over 15,000 deaths and triggered a level seven meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant; and the 2010 Haiti Earthquake, which caused over 300,000 deaths. These joined a host of similar disasters from a landslide in Uganda, to an earthquake in Chile, and severe flooding in both Australia and Thailand.
According to a 2005 New York University report, one of the key preventable losses of life comes from the failure of telecommunications infrastructure.  These failures cause "delays and errors in emergency response and disaster relief efforts, say the authors, noting that "despite the increasing reliability and resiliency of modern telecommunications networks to physical damage, the risk associated with communications failures remains serious because of growing dependence upon these tools in emergency operations."
Published five months after the Indian Ocean tsunami and four months before hurricane Katrina, the report also stated: "The Indian Ocean tsunami of December 2004 highlighted the human cost of communications breakdowns during disasters. While seismic monitoring stations throughout the world detected the massive sub-sea earthquake that triggered the tsunami, a lack of procedures for communicating these warnings to governments and inadequate infrastructure in the regions at risk delayed the transmission of warnings. Yet, based on the successful evacuation of the handful of communities that did receive adequate warning through unofficial channels, it is clear that better communications could have saved tens or hundreds of thousands of lives."
Please login to post your comment - click here
- No news
MOST POPULAR NEWS
- Tutorial: How to think in dB
- Project pushes gigabit data rates over copper telephone lines
- Robot truck concept from Daimler
- Researchers discover how beryllium causes deadly lung disease
- Synthetic aperture radar helps detect IEDs in all conditions
- Banning cellphones while driving does not decreases accidents, researchers find
- Bluetooth strikes back against Thread
- RFID tags track honey bees
- Researcher claims next generation internet will arrive quietly
- Mobile phones fall silent with hybrid encrypted calling service
- How the cockpit of the future might look like
- Atomic clock based on a chip-scale frequency comb
- 'Air waveguide' creates 'optical cables' out of thin air
- When do smartphones ads work?
- Single-pixel 'multiplex' spatial light modulator captures terahertz images
- Ultra Low Noise Amplifiers
- Proper use of Field Analyzers at Lower Frequencies
- Wireless Sensor Network Challenges and Solutions
- Putting FPGAs to Work in Software Radio Systems Handbook
- Understanding WLAN offload in cellular networks
- Solutions for LTE-Advanced Manufacturing Test Â– Understanding the Requirements for LTE